| Message |
OK, of the three, 1) power - reliability; 2) power - price; or 3) reliabilty - price, I'd pick power and reliablity, and I'd pass on the price. But since you can't have power and relaiblity w/o price, the statement "you can pick two," in fact is only true for 2 of the 3 possible combinations. I've got a problem with clever statements like, you can pick two, when you can't pick any two. IMHO makes more sense just to say: for the same price you can have great reliability or high power, but not both.
 Chance favors the informed |
 |